A 29-year-old non-smoker has episodic wheeze, cough and chest tightness. Examination and baseline spirometry are normal. Blood eosinophils are not raised. Which objective finding would support a diagnosis of asthma in this adult under current BTS/NICE/SIGN guidance?
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A FeNO 52 ppb
The 2024 joint BTS/NICE/SIGN guideline (NICE NG245) asks for objective evidence before diagnosing asthma, because symptoms alone are non-specific. In adults, the usual first test is a raised blood eosinophil count or FeNO. FeNO of 50 ppb or more confirms type 2 airway inflammation and supports the diagnosis, so 52 ppb is enough. If FeNO is 40–49 ppb, an eosinophil count above the laboratory reference range can support asthma instead. If neither is diagnostic, look for variable airflow obstruction: bronchodilator reversibility with an FEV1 increase of 12% or more and 200 mL or more from baseline, or an increase of 10% or more of predicted normal FEV1; or peak flow variability of 20% or more over 2 weeks. If doubt remains, refer for bronchial challenge testing. Normal baseline spirometry between episodes does not exclude asthma.
- Key clue
- Variable respiratory symptoms with normal baseline spirometry
- What it means
- Seek objective evidence of variable airflow obstruction or type 2 inflammation
- What to do
- FeNO 52 ppb exceeds the adult threshold and supports asthma
Why the other options are less appropriate
- B 42 ppb is below 50, and an eosinophil count within the normal range does not meet the alternative criterion. Neither supports the diagnosis.
- C Both thresholds are missed: the route needs 12% or more and 200 mL or more, and 10% with 180 mL meets neither.
- D Peak flow variability must be 20% or more; 16% is below the threshold.
- E The alternative bronchodilator route needs an FEV1 rise of 10% or more of predicted normal; 8% is not enough.
Source: NICE NG245: Asthma—diagnosis, monitoring and chronic asthma management