IN-DEPTH NON-ACUTE CONSULTATION · 15 MINUTES + 5 MINUTES DISCUSSION

Swelling, breathlessness and the thick-walled heart

Fictional Clinora training simulation. Awaiting final clinical review; source and safety audit completed 14 September 2026. Not an official MRCP(UK) station, a validated pass prediction or patient-specific medical advice.

Learning objectives

Candidate brief

You are reviewing Anita Desai in a rapid-access medical clinic after an echocardiogram reported increased left-ventricular wall thickness. She has progressive breathlessness and ankle swelling. Take a focused history, describe and interpret the relevant examination, and explain your differential and next steps. Address her concern that the scan means longstanding high blood pressure has damaged her heart.

Rehearse aloud before revealing teaching material. Use 15 minutes for the encounter and five minutes for examiner questions 1, 2 and 6. The other questions are teaching extensions. In a real emergency, assessment and escalation take priority over any timer.

Patient encounter: Anita Desai, 61

My blood pressure has never been very high. Why has the heart muscle become thick?
Only if asked: trajectory, congestion and immediate instability

Over nine months she has become breathless on hills and now stops after one flight of stairs. Both ankles swell by evening and she has gained 4 kg. She sleeps on two pillows but has no current breathlessness at rest, chest pain or haemoptysis.

Twice she has felt close to fainting after standing, without injury or loss of consciousness. Ask about true syncope, rapid deterioration, palpitations, reduced urine output and resting symptoms because these change an outpatient assessment into urgent acute care.

Only if asked: renal, autonomic and neurological clues

Her urine has been persistently frothy for six months. She has no visible haematuria, dysuria or known diabetes. Appetite is reduced and she has lost 6 kg despite recent fluid-related weight gain. She alternates between constipation and loose stools.

There is numbness in both feet and dizziness on standing. Her hands tingle at night; right carpal-tunnel decompression three years ago gave incomplete relief. These clues suggest multisystem disease but are not individually diagnostic.

Only if asked: soft-tissue, bleeding and plasma-cell symptoms

She has noticed that her tongue feels larger and she sometimes bites its edge. Bruising appears around her eyes after rubbing them and on her forearms after minor knocks. There is no overt gastrointestinal bleeding.

She has fatigue but no persistent focal bone pain, recurrent infection, thirst or confusion. Absence of classic myeloma symptoms does not exclude a small plasma-cell clone producing pathogenic light chains.

Background, medicines, family history and priorities

Hypertension was diagnosed four years ago and is usually around 130/75 mmHg on amlodipine 5 mg. She also takes furosemide 20 mg, started two weeks ago, and occasional ibuprofen. No chemotherapy, inflammatory disease or chronic infection. Ask about herbal products and medicines that worsen fluid balance or renal function.

Her father developed heart failure aged 82 but there is no known inherited neuropathy or cardiomyopathy. She is an accountant caring for her mother. Her friend had myeloma, so she fears cancer; she wants reassurance from a scan rather than a biopsy.

Examination: findings and interpretation

Ask permission, preserve dignity and describe what you would examine and why. Reveal the relevant findings only after doing so.

Stability and haemodynamic reserve come first

Alert and comfortable at rest. Pulse 88/min and regular, seated BP 112/70 mmHg, respiratory rate 18/min, oxygen saturation 96% on air and temperature 36.6°C. On standing, BP falls to 88/58 mmHg with light-headedness and pulse 92/min; sit her down safely.

The limited heart-rate response may reflect autonomic involvement or medication effects. Syncope, shock, resting hypoxaemia, severe chest pain or pulmonary oedema would interrupt the station and require acute assessment.

General and soft-tissue examination: use clues without overclaiming

There is mild periorbital purpura and macroglossia with tooth indentation. No palpable lymphadenopathy. Inspect for bruising, nutritional loss and signs of an alternative systemic disorder while preserving dignity.

Macroglossia and periorbital purpura strongly raise suspicion for AL amyloidosis in this context, but diagnosis still requires evidence of amyloid and accurate typing. Do not tell the patient that an examination sign proves myeloma.

Cardiovascular and volume assessment with interpretation

JVP is elevated, heart sounds are quiet and there is no loud valve murmur. Bibasal fine crackles and bilateral pitting oedema to mid-shin are present. Peripheries are warm. The apex is not markedly displaced.

This supports congestion with a restrictive or infiltrative phenotype. Carefully assess volume because excessive diuresis can worsen low-output symptoms and orthostatic hypotension; a normal-sized heart or lack of a dramatic murmur does not reassure.

Renal, neurological and functional completion

The abdomen is soft without ascites or organomegaly. There is reduced pinprick and vibration in a stocking distribution with preserved power and ankle reflexes reduced. Tinel testing is not a substitute for a full neuropathy assessment.

Complete the examination with urinalysis, weight and functional assessment. Look for alternative causes of neuropathy and oedema. Avoid forcing prolonged gait or exertion testing after symptomatic orthostatic hypotension.

Investigation cards

State your next action before opening each card. Later results are not information available at the start of the encounter.

Card 1 — quantify organ involvement and search for a monoclonal protein

Urine albumin:creatinine ratio is 420 mg/mmol; laboratory protein:creatinine ratio confirms heavy proteinuria. Serum albumin is 24 g/L, creatinine 126 micromol/L with eGFR 42 mL/min/1.73 m², and adjusted calcium is normal. Haemoglobin is 108 g/L; platelets are normal.

Serum and urine immunofixation identify a lambda monoclonal light chain; the serum free-light-chain ratio is markedly abnormal after interpretation in the context of renal function. Use the complete monoclonal screen: serum electrophoresis alone is not sufficiently sensitive to exclude AL amyloidosis.

Card 2 — cardiac phenotype and severity

ECG shows low limb-lead voltages and first-degree AV block. Echocardiography reports concentric wall thickening, biatrial enlargement, restrictive filling, reduced longitudinal strain with relative apical sparing and preserved ejection fraction. This pattern raises suspicion but does not type amyloid.

NT-proBNP is markedly elevated and high-sensitivity troponin is persistently above the reference range without an acute rise-and-fall pattern. Interpret biomarkers with renal function, rhythm and volume status; they contribute to cardiac severity assessment rather than serving as a binary diagnostic test.

Card 3 — the scintigraphy trap

Cardiac magnetic resonance shows diffuse subendocardial late gadolinium enhancement and abnormal myocardial tissue characteristics compatible with cardiac amyloidosis. A DPD scan shows grade 2 cardiac uptake.

Because a monoclonal protein is present, grade 2 uptake cannot establish ATTR non-invasively. AL amyloidosis, ATTR with an incidental monoclonal gammopathy, or less commonly dual pathology remain possible. Tissue confirmation and expert amyloid typing are required before disease-specific treatment.

Card 4 — confirm amyloid, then type it

Abdominal fat aspiration is non-diagnostic. This does not exclude amyloidosis. After multidisciplinary discussion of bleeding risk, yield and organ involvement, a renal biopsy demonstrates Congo-red-positive deposits with apple-green birefringence under polarised light.

Validated proteomic typing identifies lambda light-chain amyloid. Bone-marrow assessment demonstrates a small plasma-cell clone. The clone size does not reflect the severity of organ injury; treatment urgency is driven by the toxic precursor and cardiac involvement, not only by the percentage of plasma cells.

Worked consultation and clinical reasoning

Problem representation and discriminating differential

This is a multisystem infiltrative disorder with restrictive cardiac disease, nephrotic-range protein loss, autonomic and peripheral neuropathy, macroglossia and periorbital purpura. AL amyloidosis is the leading diagnosis, with ATTR amyloidosis plus an incidental monoclonal gammopathy an important alternative until tissue is typed.

Hypertensive heart disease does not explain the low voltages, multisystem features or degree of proteinuria. Other considerations include light-chain deposition disease, another plasma-cell disorder, diabetic or immune renal disease and alternative cardiomyopathies, but the plan must first exclude rapidly progressive AL disease.

Make urgency and ownership explicit

Arrange urgent coordinated review by haematology and the NHS National Amyloidosis Centre, while cardiology and nephrology manage current organ problems. Specify who is contacting whom and when; ‘refer to several MDTs’ is not an adequate endpoint.

Assess cardiac biomarkers, rhythm, blood pressure, renal function, proteinuria, thrombotic and bleeding risks and functional status promptly. Advanced cardiac AL can deteriorate quickly, so a routine months-long monoclonal-gammopathy pathway would be unsafe.

Confirm and type before choosing treatment

Seek histological proof where feasible and type deposits in an experienced laboratory. A positive monoclonal screen does not by itself prove AL; conversely, a positive DPD scan cannot diagnose ATTR non-invasively when monoclonal studies are abnormal.

Bone-marrow assessment characterises the clone but does not replace tissue typing. If a low-risk tissue site is negative, reconsider an involved-organ biopsy with specialist input rather than falsely closing the diagnosis.

Treatment principle and supportive care

For confirmed systemic AL amyloidosis, specialist treatment suppresses the light-chain-producing clone as rapidly and deeply as safely possible, using a contemporary risk-adapted regimen. Choice and dose depend on cardiac stage, neuropathy, renal function, frailty and treatment availability; do not prescribe a memorised chemotherapy protocol in a PACES answer.

Use cautious diuresis with daily weight, symptoms, renal function, electrolytes and blood pressure. Standard heart-failure drugs may be poorly tolerated in restrictive amyloid cardiomyopathy because of hypotension and fixed stroke volume. Review NSAIDs and other contributors. Address nephrotic thrombosis risk and anticoagulation individually rather than automatically treating every patient.

Explain uncertainty and biopsy without equating amyloid with myeloma

‘The heart scan suggests that an abnormal protein may be collecting in the heart, but the same process may also explain the protein leaking from your kidneys, the blood-pressure drop and the nerve symptoms. High blood pressure alone would not explain the full pattern.’

‘We have found an abnormal light-chain protein, but that does not by itself tell us exactly which protein is in the tissues. The nuclear scan can strongly support one type only when the light-chain tests are normal. We therefore need a small tissue sample and specialist typing before choosing treatment. Some people have a small bone-marrow cell population rather than classical myeloma; I will not label this until the tests are complete.’

Shared decision, practical support and safety-net

Explore what she fears about biopsy and what caring responsibilities make urgent appointments difficult. Explain the proposed biopsy site, expected benefit, material bleeding and organ-specific risks, alternatives and what delay could mean. Offer a supporter and coordinate appointments where possible without trading away urgency.

Advise urgent assessment for syncope, breathlessness at rest, chest pain, rapidly worsening oedema, marked reduction in urine, new palpitations or neurological symptoms. Use teach-back to confirm why typing—not merely finding amyloid—determines treatment.

Examiner discussion

Five-minute subset: questions 1, 2 and 6. Give your answer first, then compare the reasoning.

1. Why is the ECG–echo discordance useful?

Reveal worked answer

Increased ventricular wall thickness with unexpectedly low ECG voltages suggests infiltration rather than true myocyte hypertrophy. It is a clue, not a rule: voltage may be normal and other diseases can produce similar patterns. Interpret it with clinical features, strain, CMR and laboratory findings.

2. Can grade 2 DPD uptake diagnose ATTR in this patient?

Reveal worked answer

No. Non-biopsy ATTR diagnosis requires the appropriate cardiac phenotype, significant bone-tracer uptake and absence of a monoclonal protein on a complete screen. Her monoclonal light chain means tissue confirmation and amyloid typing are required; otherwise AL could be dangerously misclassified as ATTR.

3. Does a small plasma-cell clone make AL disease mild?

Reveal worked answer

No. A small clone can produce highly pathogenic light chains and severe cardiac or renal injury. Organ involvement, cardiac biomarkers, haemodynamics and response of the light-chain burden determine urgency and prognosis more than clone size alone.

4. What if the abdominal fat biopsy is negative?

Reveal worked answer

A negative fat sample reduces sensitivity but does not exclude disease. Reassess pre-test probability and sample quality, seek expert pathology review and consider another accessible or involved-organ biopsy after balancing yield and procedural risk. Never report a negative screening biopsy as definitive exclusion in a compelling multisystem phenotype.

5. Why might conventional heart-failure treatment be difficult?

Reveal worked answer

Restrictive physiology can make stroke volume relatively fixed, while autonomic dysfunction and low blood pressure reduce tolerance of vasodilators and neurohormonal drugs. Congestion still needs treatment, often with carefully titrated diuresis, but therapy must be individualised with close renal and haemodynamic monitoring.

6. What determines the urgency of haematological treatment?

Reveal worked answer

Confirmed AL type, cardiac involvement and physiological severity make rapid specialist treatment essential. The aim is prompt suppression of amyloid-forming light-chain production while supporting affected organs. Cardiac stage, renal function, neuropathy, frailty and treatment tolerance shape the regimen and monitoring plan.

What changes if…?

Each variation changes the baseline case. Explain both what changes in management and what remains important.

She collapses with a systolic blood pressure of 74 mmHg

Stop the outpatient sequence and manage ABCDE with acute cardiology and critical-care input. Look for arrhythmia, sepsis, bleeding, pulmonary embolism, over-diuresis and low-output cardiac amyloid. Do not give large unmonitored fluid boluses or assume the orthostatic diagnosis explains shock.

The monoclonal screen is completely negative

With a convincing cardiac phenotype and grade 2–3 bone-tracer uptake, expert review may support a non-biopsy ATTR diagnosis after confirming the required testing and scan quality. Genetic testing is then needed to distinguish hereditary from wild-type ATTR where appropriate; do not infer wild-type disease from age alone.

Biopsy identifies transthyretin rather than light-chain amyloid

The monoclonal gammopathy may be incidental. Stop framing treatment around plasma-cell suppression and follow the ATTR pathway, including specialist assessment, genetic testing and phenotype-appropriate therapy. Continue to manage cardiac and neurological complications while explaining why the diagnosis changed.

She declines biopsy after an informed discussion

Explore the feared harm, offer specialist pathology and procedural counselling, consider whether another site offers a better risk–yield balance and provide time for a supporter or second opinion where clinically safe. Respect a capacitous refusal, but explain that empirical AL or ATTR treatment without secure typing may be ineffective or harmful; agree the safest monitoring and revisit plan.

Case-specific reflection

Formative Clinora anchors, not official PACES marks. Identify one missed decision and one communication improvement, then repeat the encounter.

Multisystem history

Strong: Connects congestion, proteinuria, autonomic symptoms, neuropathy, carpal tunnel, bruising, macroglossia and weight change.

Incomplete: Takes a heart-failure history but misses renal, neurological and soft-tissue clues.

Unsafe: Attributes the entire picture to mild hypertension without investigating systemic disease.

Examination and severity

Strong: Assesses orthostatic safety, congestion, soft-tissue clues and neuropathy, then states the limits of each sign.

Incomplete: Lists amyloid signs without assessing haemodynamic reserve or functional impact.

Unsafe: Forces exertion despite symptomatic hypotension or treats macroglossia as proof of myeloma.

Diagnostic sequence and typing

Strong: Uses complete monoclonal studies, imaging and tissue typing; recognises why DPD cannot label ATTR here.

Incomplete: Suspects amyloid but gives no safe route from phenotype to typed diagnosis.

Unsafe: Diagnoses ATTR from DPD despite a monoclonal protein, or diagnoses AL from the clone alone.

Management and ownership

Strong: Makes an urgent amyloid/haematology referral while coordinating cardiac, renal and supportive care with named ownership.

Incomplete: Says ‘refer to MDT’ without urgency, organ staging or an interim plan.

Unsafe: Delays cardiac AL assessment, prescribes empirical chemotherapy or applies routine heart-failure escalation despite hypotension.

Communication and consent

Strong: Explains the difference between detecting and typing amyloid, addresses cancer fear and negotiates biopsy without coercion.

Incomplete: Provides technically correct information but does not discover the biopsy or caring concerns.

Unsafe: Calls the condition myeloma before confirmation, guarantees a scan diagnosis or dismisses refusal.

Learning summary and deliberate practice

Five decisions to retain

Treat amyloidosis as a multisystem diagnosis: the heart, kidneys, nerves, blood pressure and soft tissues may tell one story.

A monoclonal protein is neither proof of AL nor a harmless incidental finding until the amyloid type is secure.

Bone-tracer uptake can support non-biopsy ATTR only after a complete monoclonal screen is negative in the right phenotype.

A negative fat biopsy does not exclude amyloid when clinical probability remains high.

Cardiac AL requires urgent specialist assessment; support congestion carefully and suppress the pathological precursor after typing.

Deliberate-practice drill

Give a two-minute explanation of why the DPD scan does not settle the diagnosis in Anita. Then hand over to haematology using one sentence for phenotype, one for severity, one for diagnostic status and one definite request.