Gastroenterology, haematology and acute medicine · FICTIONAL CASE

Haematemesis, shock and the race to endoscopy

Balance immediate resuscitation with early definitive control, communicate anticoagulant risk and avoid treating a haemoglobin value in isolation.

Resuscitation, risk and definitive haemostasis16 minutes0/3 decisions explored
PAUSE BEFORE USING

This is educational content, not a clinical protocol. Verify current guidance, use local pathways and seek appropriate senior or specialist help.

THE CASE

A fictional 68-year-old presents with large-volume haematemesis, melaena and hypotension. They take warfarin for a mechanical heart valve and appear clammy and confused.

01 · INITIAL PRESENTATION

Listen for the assumption.

SHO

The haemoglobin is only mildly reduced, so I wondered whether to wait for a repeat result before activating major haemorrhage support.

Registrar

Why can the first haemoglobin be falsely reassuring in acute blood loss?

SHO

It may not yet reflect the volume lost. The clinical picture should drive resuscitation, reversal planning and urgent endoscopy.

WHERE IS THE CONSULTANT?

Choose an answer below and reveal the reasoning to see consultant feedback at every checkpoint. The full consultant-led synthesis follows after all three decisions.

Go to the first decision ↓
EVOLVING INFORMATION

The picture develops.

  1. Persistent hypotension despite initial resuscitation
  2. INR is markedly elevated
  3. No known cirrhosis, but the bleeding source is not yet established
02 · DECISION CHECKPOINTS

Commit before you reveal.

After you select an option, reveal the model reasoning and the consultant’s feedback.

DECISION 1What should determine blood-product and escalation decisions?
DECISION 2How should warfarin-associated active bleeding be addressed?
DECISION 3When should an unstable patient with severe upper GI bleeding undergo endoscopy?
03 · CONSULTANT-LED SYNTHESIS

Hear the senior team refine the plan.

The registrar tests the plan, the consultant synthesises the key principle, and the SHO confirms the safer next steps.

Registrar

I will use Blatchford scoring, but instability already determines the urgency and level of care.

Consultant

Agreed. Coordinate haemorrhage support, anticoagulant reversal, anaesthetic input and endoscopy, while considering variceal treatment if the history changes the probability.

SHO

My handover will give the bleeding and physiological trajectory, access, products, reversal, comorbidities and endoscopy plan.

CLINORA DECISION TRACE
01 · CUEHaematemesis with shock and warfarin use
02 · INTERPRETSevere upper GI bleeding despite a potentially misleading first haemoglobin
03 · ACTResuscitate, reverse safely, escalate and arrange definitive haemostasis
SAFETY CHECK

What must remain explicit.

  • Activate local major-haemorrhage support when indicated.
  • Discuss urgent reversal in the context of the anticoagulation indication.
  • Involve endoscopy and anaesthesia early for an unstable patient.
COMMON ERRORS

Where reasoning fails.

  • Waiting for haemoglobin to fall
  • Over-transfusion without clinical reassessment
  • Allowing resuscitation to delay definitive control indefinitely
STRUCTURED HANDOVER
Severe upper GI bleeding with haematemesis/melaena [extent], physiology [trend], anticoagulation [drug/indication/result], access/products/reversal [details] and endoscopy plan [time/team].
REFLECTIVE PAUSE

Which information must be communicated simultaneously to the endoscopist, transfusion laboratory and anaesthetist?