Gastroenterology and colorectal surgery · FICTIONAL CASE

Bloody diarrhoea, fever and a narrowing rescue window

Recognise acute severe ulcerative colitis, investigate infection and toxicity, and plan rescue or surgery before deterioration dictates the choice.

Parallel medical and surgical decision-making16 minutes0/3 decisions explored
PAUSE BEFORE USING

This is educational content, not a clinical protocol. Verify current guidance, use local pathways and seek appropriate senior or specialist help.

THE CASE

A fictional 31-year-old with ulcerative colitis is admitted with frequent bloody stools, tachycardia, anaemia and raised inflammatory markers.

01 · INITIAL PRESENTATION

Listen for the assumption.

SHO

I planned intravenous steroids and would contact surgery only if rescue therapy failed.

Registrar

Surgical involvement starts early. Infection testing, thromboprophylaxis, imaging and daily objective assessment must run alongside steroid treatment.

SHO

I will make the reassessment point and escalation options explicit from admission.

WHERE IS THE CONSULTANT?

Choose an answer below and reveal the reasoning to see consultant feedback at every checkpoint. The full consultant-led synthesis follows after all three decisions.

Go to the first decision ↓
EVOLVING INFORMATION

The picture develops.

  1. Frequent bloody stools with systemic toxicity
  2. Abdominal distension is increasing
  3. Stool infection testing is pending
02 · DECISION CHECKPOINTS

Commit before you reveal.

After you select an option, reveal the model reasoning and the consultant’s feedback.

DECISION 1What is the safest admission plan?
DECISION 2Why is objective early reassessment essential?
DECISION 3What does increasing distension require?
03 · CONSULTANT-LED SYNTHESIS

Hear the senior team refine the plan.

The registrar tests the plan, the consultant synthesises the key principle, and the SHO confirms the safer next steps.

Registrar

Track stool frequency, observations, abdominal findings and laboratory markers, and avoid medicines that increase toxic-dilatation risk.

Consultant

Agree rescue eligibility and surgical thresholds with the patient and colorectal team before the patient becomes too unwell for a balanced decision.

SHO

I will document the daily response criteria and who will make the rescue-versus-surgery decision.

CLINORA DECISION TRACE
01 · CUEBloody diarrhoea plus systemic toxicity
02 · INTERPRETAcute severe ulcerative colitis
03 · ACTStart coordinated treatment and schedule objective rescue/surgery reassessment
SAFETY CHECK

What must remain explicit.

  • Follow the current local ASUC pathway and 2025 BSG guidance.
  • Involve colorectal surgery early.
  • Escalate new distension, tenderness, systemic deterioration or rising lactate immediately.
COMMON ERRORS

Where reasoning fails.

  • Delayed surgical referral
  • No predefined reassessment point
  • Ignoring thrombosis and infection risk
STRUCTURED HANDOVER
ASUC with stool frequency [trend], observations/abdomen [trend], inflammatory and haemoglobin markers [trend], infection results [status], treatment [response] and rescue/surgical decision [time/owner].
REFLECTIVE PAUSE

Does your admission template force documentation of the rescue decision point?