Gastroenterology and colorectal surgery · FICTIONAL CASE

Day three in severe colitis: the rescue window is closing

Reassess acute severe ulcerative colitis objectively at day three and avoid delay when intravenous corticosteroids are failing.

Steroid non-response, rescue choice and operative readiness16 minutes0/3 decisions explored
PAUSE BEFORE USING

This is educational content, not a clinical protocol. Verify current guidance, use local pathways and seek appropriate senior or specialist help.

THE CASE

A fictional 29-year-old admitted with acute severe ulcerative colitis has received intravenous corticosteroids for three days. There are nine bloody stools in 24 hours, CRP remains 72 mg/L and abdominal distension is slightly worse; infection studies have not identified an alternative cause.

01 · INITIAL PRESENTATION

Listen for the assumption.

SHO

There is no perforation, so I thought we could continue the same treatment for another few days.

Registrar

This is the planned response checkpoint. Persistent frequent stools, inflammation and changing abdominal findings require an IBD and colorectal decision now—not passive observation.

SHO

I will request immediate joint review for rescue medical therapy versus surgery and repeat the toxicity assessment.

WHERE IS THE CONSULTANT?

Choose an answer below and reveal the reasoning to see consultant feedback at every checkpoint. The full consultant-led synthesis follows after all three decisions.

Go to the first decision ↓
EVOLVING INFORMATION

The picture develops.

  1. Nine bloody stools in 24 hours
  2. CRP 72 mg/L after three days of intravenous corticosteroids
  3. Increasing distension without radiographic perforation
02 · DECISION CHECKPOINTS

Commit before you reveal.

After you select an option, reveal the model reasoning and the consultant’s feedback.

DECISION 1What is the priority at this point?
DECISION 2What must influence the rescue choice?
DECISION 3Which change overrides routine rescue planning?
03 · CONSULTANT-LED SYNTHESIS

Hear the senior team refine the plan.

The registrar tests the plan, the consultant synthesises the key principle, and the SHO confirms the safer next steps.

Registrar

Continue thromboprophylaxis unless contraindicated, nutrition and fluid/electrolyte care, infection surveillance and frequent abdominal assessment.

Consultant

Explain both rescue and surgical pathways clearly. A second-line medicine is not permission for an open-ended trial; record response criteria and the next decision time.

SHO

I will document the response measures, rescue eligibility, operative concerns and a named time for reassessment.

CLINORA DECISION TRACE
01 · CUEPersistent high stool frequency and inflammation after three days
02 · INTERPRETProbable corticosteroid non-response with narrowing rescue window
03 · ACTMake a joint rescue-versus-surgery decision now
SAFETY CHECK

What must remain explicit.

  • Follow the current local ASUC pathway and 2025 BSG guidance.
  • Keep colorectal surgery involved throughout rescue treatment.
  • Escalate distension, tenderness, fever, tachycardia, hypotension or rising lactate immediately.
COMMON ERRORS

Where reasoning fails.

  • Open-ended steroid treatment
  • Serial rescue therapies without clear limits
  • Treating surgical review as a last resort
STRUCTURED HANDOVER
ASUC day [number], stools [number/trend], CRP and observations [trend], abdomen/imaging [findings], infection results [status], steroid response [assessment] and rescue/surgical decision [time/owner].
REFLECTIVE PAUSE

Does your ASUC pathway state who makes the day-three decision and what happens overnight if the patient worsens?