ANSWER AND REASONINGB. Early exploration and microsurgical repair of the injured facial branch when feasible
Immediate focal weakness after a sharp wound implies transection. Early identification and tension-free repair offer the best chance of recovery; distal branches near the medial face may have redundancy, but the temple branch is functionally important.
Why every option is right or wrong
A. Wait twelve months before assessing the wound: The repair opportunity and identifiable nerve ends may be lost.
B. Early exploration and microsurgical repair of the injured facial branch when feasible: Immediate focal weakness after a sharp wound implies transection. Early identification and tension-free repair offer the best chance of recovery; distal branches near the medial face may have redundancy, but the temple branch is functionally important.
C. Inject botulinum toxin into the weak side: This cannot restore a divided nerve.
D. Perform permanent brow lift alone immediately: Static correction does not replace primary nerve repair when feasible.
E. Close skin without documenting function: Baseline branch examination and informed planning are essential.
What if the scenario changed?
If weakness developed days after a blunt injury with nerve continuity likely, observation and serial grading could be appropriate.
EDUCATIONAL USEIndependent Clinora educational preparation material; not official JCIE content, an accredited programme, clinical advice, or a substitute for current guidance, local policy and specialist judgement.
Back to the Section 1 bank