ANSWER AND REASONINGD. Cocaine or levamisole-associated midline destructive disease is likely
Cocaine-related injury can mimic vasculitis clinically and serologically. Toxicology history, disease distribution, biopsy and systemic assessment help distinguish it from granulomatosis with polyangiitis; abstinence is fundamental.
Why every option is right or wrong
A. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis is proved by any positive ANCA: ANCA patterns are not diagnostic in isolation.
B. Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma can be excluded without biopsy: Destructive malignancy remains an important differential.
C. Reconstruction should proceed during ongoing cocaine use: Persistent vasoconstriction makes failure likely.
D. Cocaine or levamisole-associated midline destructive disease is likely: Cocaine-related injury can mimic vasculitis clinically and serologically. Toxicology history, disease distribution, biopsy and systemic assessment help distinguish it from granulomatosis with polyangiitis; abstinence is fundamental.
E. Topical decongestants alone will reverse the defect: Established tissue loss requires cessation and later reconstruction planning.
What if the scenario changed?
If renal impairment, pulmonary nodules and biopsy-proven granulomatous vasculitis were present, GPA would be more likely.
EDUCATIONAL USEIndependent Clinora educational preparation material; not official JCIE content, an accredited programme, clinical advice, or a substitute for current guidance, local policy and specialist judgement.
Back to the Section 1 bank