FRCS (ORL-HNS) · SECTION 1 SBA

Traumatic optic neuropathy

After craniofacial trauma, a patient has severe visual loss and a relative afferent pupillary defect but no orbital compartment syndrome and no compressive bone fragment on CT. What is the most defensible management principle?

CHOOSE ONE ANSWER

Best of five

  1. A. Urgent specialist assessment acknowledging uncertainty around steroids and decompression
  2. B. Automatic megadose steroid treatment
  3. C. Routine optic-canal decompression for every patient
  4. D. Delay ophthalmic assessment for a week
  5. E. Lateral canthotomy despite normal orbital pressure
ANSWER AND REASONING

A. Urgent specialist assessment acknowledging uncertainty around steroids and decompression

Indirect traumatic optic neuropathy is a clinical diagnosis with limited high-quality evidence for high-dose steroids or surgery. Immediate ophthalmic and skull-base assessment, exclusion of reversible compression and honest discussion of uncertainty are essential.

Why every option is right or wrong

A. Urgent specialist assessment acknowledging uncertainty around steroids and decompression: Indirect traumatic optic neuropathy is a clinical diagnosis with limited high-quality evidence for high-dose steroids or surgery. Immediate ophthalmic and skull-base assessment, exclusion of reversible compression and honest discussion of uncertainty are essential.

B. Automatic megadose steroid treatment: Benefit is unproven and major harms can occur in trauma.

C. Routine optic-canal decompression for every patient: Surgery is not universally beneficial and carries risk.

D. Delay ophthalmic assessment for a week: Other treatable causes of visual loss must be excluded urgently.

E. Lateral canthotomy despite normal orbital pressure: Canthotomy treats orbital compartment syndrome, which is absent.

What if the scenario changed?

If a tense orbit, proptosis and raised pressure developed, immediate canthotomy and cantholysis would be required.

EDUCATIONAL USE

Independent Clinora educational preparation material; not official JCIE content, an accredited programme, clinical advice, or a substitute for current guidance, local policy and specialist judgement.

Back to the Section 1 bank