ANSWER AND REASONINGA. Response assessment with appropriately timed PET-CT and MDT interpretation
Post-treatment anatomical masses may represent fibrosis. PET-CT at an appropriate interval helps identify metabolically persistent disease and can avoid unnecessary neck dissection when response is complete.
Why every option is right or wrong
A. Response assessment with appropriately timed PET-CT and MDT interpretation: Post-treatment anatomical masses may represent fibrosis. PET-CT at an appropriate interval helps identify metabolically persistent disease and can avoid unnecessary neck dissection when response is complete.
B. Immediate radical neck dissection for every residual lump: Anatomical persistence alone is not proof of viable tumour.
C. Open biopsy before imaging: This can complicate a treated neck and should not precede planned response assessment.
D. Discharge because the mass is smaller: Residual or recurrent disease must be assessed.
E. Repeat radiotherapy empirically: Re-irradiation without evidence carries major toxicity.
What if the scenario changed?
If PET-CT showed focal persistent avidity with corroborating findings, tissue confirmation and salvage planning would be considered.
EDUCATIONAL USEIndependent Clinora educational preparation material; not official JCIE content, an accredited programme, clinical advice, or a substitute for current guidance, local policy and specialist judgement.
Back to the Section 1 bank