ANSWER AND REASONINGA. Consider marginal mandibulectomy if oncological clearance is achievable
Superficial cortical involvement may be cleared with a marginal resection while preserving continuity. Segmental mandibulectomy is required when medullary invasion, canal involvement or inadequate residual height prevents safe clearance.
Why every option is right or wrong
A. Consider marginal mandibulectomy if oncological clearance is achievable: Superficial cortical involvement may be cleared with a marginal resection while preserving continuity. Segmental mandibulectomy is required when medullary invasion, canal involvement or inadequate residual height prevents safe clearance.
B. Segmental mandibulectomy is mandatory whenever tumour touches bone: Contact alone does not prove deep invasion.
C. Strip tumour from periosteum without a margin: This risks leaving involved tissue.
D. Radiotherapy alone is always equivalent: Resectable oral cancer often requires surgery and neck management.
E. Ignore dental and reconstructive planning: Occlusion, residual strength and rehabilitation affect the operation.
What if the scenario changed?
If MRI or CT demonstrated medullary invasion reaching the inferior alveolar canal, segmental resection would be favoured.
EDUCATIONAL USEIndependent Clinora educational preparation material; not official JCIE content, an accredited programme, clinical advice, or a substitute for current guidance, local policy and specialist judgement.
Back to the Section 1 bank