ANSWER AND REASONINGC. Acknowledge prognosis honestly while exploring the patient's concerns and avoiding the phrase 'good cancer'
NICE specifically advises against calling thyroid cancer a 'good cancer' because it can invalidate concern. Communication should cover prognosis, treatment burden, long-term hormone needs and uncertainties in language meaningful to the patient.
Why every option is right or wrong
A. Repeat the phrase more emphatically to reassure: Repetition compounds minimisation and may undermine trust.
B. Give survival statistics without asking what matters to the patient: Numbers alone do not constitute supported decision-making or address individual concerns.
C. Acknowledge prognosis honestly while exploring the patient's concerns and avoiding the phrase 'good cancer': NICE specifically advises against calling thyroid cancer a 'good cancer' because it can invalidate concern. Communication should cover prognosis, treatment burden, long-term hormone needs and uncertainties in language meaningful to the patient.
D. Avoid discussing long-term effects until after surgery: Potential hypothyroidism, hypoparathyroidism, voice and swallowing effects belong in preoperative discussion.
E. Delegate all explanation to a leaflet: Written information supports but does not replace a personalised clinical conversation.
What if the scenario changed?
If the prognosis were uncertain or high risk, explicitly naming that uncertainty and arranging further discussion would be safer than false reassurance.
EDUCATIONAL USEIndependent Clinora educational preparation material; not official JCIE content, an accredited programme, clinical advice, or a substitute for local policy and specialist judgement.
Back to the Section 1 bank