A 66-year-old has a substantial air–bone gap and severe high-frequency sensorineural loss. Repeated validated aided word testing shows very poor recognition disproportionate to audibility. CT is compatible with fenestral otosclerosis. What is the best counselling?
At consultant level, candidacy depends on functional benefit, not simply an operable air–bone gap; very poor validated word recognition should temper expectations and broaden rehabilitation discussion.
A. Stapes surgery may close the conductive gap but is unlikely to correct poor cochlear speech discrimination; compare implantable and non-surgical rehabilitation: The audiogram and speech testing show a major cochlear limitation, so technical closure of the gap may yield little functional benefit.
B. A visible fenestral focus guarantees excellent speech outcomes: CT confirms anatomy, not neural speech performance.
C. The air–bone gap makes cochlear reserve irrelevant: Bone thresholds and speech discrimination are crucial to expected benefit.
D. Operate without discussing dead ear or taste disturbance: These are material procedure-specific risks.
E. CT evidence means hearing aids are contraindicated: Amplification remains an option and should be compared with surgery and implant pathways.
If bone thresholds and aided word recognition were good, stapedotomy would be more likely to deliver meaningful benefit.
Independent Clinora educational preparation material; not official JCIE content, an accredited programme, or a substitute for local policy and specialist clinical judgement.
Back to the Section 1 bank