ANSWER AND REASONINGA. Endoscopic clearance and ventilation followed by topical anti-inflammatory treatment and surveillance
The pattern supports allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, a non-invasive inflammatory disease. Surgery removes obstructive allergic mucin and restores access for topical corticosteroid therapy; recurrence surveillance is essential.
Why every option is right or wrong
A. Endoscopic clearance and ventilation followed by topical anti-inflammatory treatment and surveillance: The pattern supports allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, a non-invasive inflammatory disease. Surgery removes obstructive allergic mucin and restores access for topical corticosteroid therapy; recurrence surveillance is essential.
B. Radical maxillectomy for invasive malignancy: Smooth remodelling and absence of tissue invasion do not justify oncological resection.
C. Systemic amphotericin as sole treatment: This is not acute invasive fungal disease, and medication alone does not clear impacted mucin.
D. No treatment because the patient is immunocompetent: Non-invasive disease can still expand, erode bone and threaten the orbit.
E. Orbital exenteration: There is no invasive orbital fungal necrosis or malignant invasion.
What if the scenario changed?
If biopsy demonstrated angioinvasion with necrosis in a neutropenic patient, urgent radical debridement plus systemic antifungal treatment would be required.
EDUCATIONAL USEIndependent Clinora educational material; not official JCIE content, an accredited programme, clinical advice, or a substitute for local policy and specialist judgement.
Back to the Section 1 bank