ANSWER AND REASONINGD. Multidisciplinary cranialisation with dural repair and exclusion of the sinonasal tract
Severe posterior-table disruption with persistent CSF leak and outflow injury requires separation of the intracranial space from sinonasal mucosa, secure dural closure and management of the frontal recess.
Why every option is right or wrong
A. Closed nasal reduction alone: This does not address the posterior table, dura or contaminated sinus.
B. Observe indefinitely because many leaks stop: The combination of comminution, displacement and outflow disruption carries persistent meningitis and mucocele risk.
C. Obliterate only the nasolacrimal duct: This is not the frontal sinus drainage pathway or dural defect.
D. Multidisciplinary cranialisation with dural repair and exclusion of the sinonasal tract: Severe posterior-table disruption with persistent CSF leak and outflow injury requires separation of the intracranial space from sinonasal mucosa, secure dural closure and management of the frontal recess.
E. Perform cosmetic forehead camouflage without sinus treatment: Contour correction alone leaves the intracranial communication untreated.
What if the scenario changed?
If the posterior-table fracture were minimally displaced, the outflow tract patent and the leak resolved promptly, close radiological and clinical observation could be appropriate.
EDUCATIONAL USEIndependent Clinora educational material; not official JCIE content, an accredited programme, clinical advice, or a substitute for local policy and specialist judgement.
Back to the Section 1 bank