ANSWER AND REASONINGA. Clinical and MRI surveillance with eye-care advice and intervention triggers
Stable small facial-nerve schwannoma with good function is usually observed because resection commonly sacrifices facial function; growth, progressive weakness, brainstem effect or hearing change prompts reconsideration.
Why every option is right or wrong
A. Clinical and MRI surveillance with eye-care advice and intervention triggers: Stable small facial-nerve schwannoma with good function is usually observed because resection commonly sacrifices facial function; growth, progressive weakness, brainstem effect or hearing change prompts reconsideration.
B. Immediate complete excision with cable graft: This trades mild weakness for predictable denervation and is not justified without progression.
C. Empirical facial nerve decompression: Decompression does not remove a stable schwannoma and exposes hearing and facial function to risk.
D. Stereotactic radiotherapy solely because enhancement is present: Enhancement establishes the lesion but is not itself an indication for irradiation.
E. Discharge because hearing is serviceable: Longitudinal imaging and functional review remain necessary.
What if the scenario changed?
If facial function deteriorated rapidly to House–Brackmann V with documented tumour growth, active treatment including surgery or radiotherapy would require multidisciplinary discussion.
EDUCATIONAL USEIndependent Clinora educational material; not official JCIE content, an accredited programme, clinical advice, or a substitute for local policy and specialist judgement.
Back to the Section 1 bank