FRCS (ORL-HNS) · SECTION 1 SBA

Zygomaticomaxillary-complex fracture

A patient has trismus, flattening of the malar prominence and infraorbital numbness after trauma. CT confirms a displaced zygomaticomaxillary-complex fracture without muscle entrapment. What most determines the indication for operative reduction?

CHOOSE ONE ANSWER

Best of five

  1. A. Infraorbital numbness alone always mandates surgery
  2. B. Functional disturbance or meaningful displacement causing facial asymmetry, after ophthalmic assessment
  3. C. Every CT-visible fracture requires fixation
  4. D. Wait until malunion is established
  5. E. Treat trismus with physiotherapy only
ANSWER AND REASONING

B. Functional disturbance or meaningful displacement causing facial asymmetry, after ophthalmic assessment

The decision is not based on one symptom alone: globe position, ocular motility, mouth opening, malar projection and the patient’s functional/cosmetic goals must be integrated.

Why every option is right or wrong

A. Infraorbital numbness alone always mandates surgery: Sensory change may recover and must be considered with the whole injury.

B. Functional disturbance or meaningful displacement causing facial asymmetry, after ophthalmic assessment: The decision is not based on one symptom alone: globe position, ocular motility, mouth opening, malar projection and the patient’s functional/cosmetic goals must be integrated.

C. Every CT-visible fracture requires fixation: Non-displaced fractures without functional deficit may be observed.

D. Wait until malunion is established: Delayed correction is more difficult and should not be the default.

E. Treat trismus with physiotherapy only: Mechanical impingement from displacement may require reduction.

What if the scenario changed?

If there were diplopia, enophthalmos or entrapment, orbital assessment would become urgent.