FRCS (ORL-HNS) · SECTION 1 SBA

Naso-orbito-ethmoid fracture planning

After central facial trauma, a patient has telecanthus and the medial canthus moves with gentle traction. CT shows a comminuted central fragment. Which operative objective is most important?

CHOOSE ONE ANSWER

Best of five

  1. A. Reconstruct stable medial-canthal-tendon support while restoring central midface projection
  2. B. Treat with nasal packing alone
  3. C. Repair only the orbital floor
  4. D. Delay all assessment until swelling resolves
  5. E. Perform isolated cosmetic rhinoplasty
ANSWER AND REASONING

A. Reconstruct stable medial-canthal-tendon support while restoring central midface projection

The tendon-bearing segment determines canthal position. Fixation that restores only bony contour but not tendon support can leave disabling telecanthus.

Why every option is right or wrong

A. Reconstruct stable medial-canthal-tendon support while restoring central midface projection: The tendon-bearing segment determines canthal position. Fixation that restores only bony contour but not tendon support can leave disabling telecanthus.

B. Treat with nasal packing alone: Packing cannot restore skeletal or tendon stability.

C. Repair only the orbital floor: This does not address the medial canthal complex.

D. Delay all assessment until swelling resolves: Early specialist planning is needed in unstable central midface injury.

E. Perform isolated cosmetic rhinoplasty: This is inadequate for a structural NOE injury.

What if the scenario changed?

If the tendon remained attached to a large stable fragment, reduction and fixation planning would be less complex.