FRCS (ORL-HNS) · SECTION 1 SBA

Pulsatile tinnitus with venous signs

A patient reports unilateral pulse-synchronous tinnitus that decreases with ipsilateral jugular compression. Otoscopy is normal and there are no focal neurological signs. What is the best next principle?

CHOOSE ONE ANSWER

Best of five

  1. A. Offer reassurance without investigation
  2. B. Perform only a pure-tone audiogram
  3. C. Start migraine prophylaxis first
  4. D. Arrange targeted audiological and vascular/temporal-bone imaging through an ENT-led pathway
  5. E. Use carotid Doppler as the sole test
ANSWER AND REASONING

D. Arrange targeted audiological and vascular/temporal-bone imaging through an ENT-led pathway

The manoeuvre suggests a venous contribution but does not establish a benign diagnosis. Imaging should be selected to assess the relevant venous and osseous anatomy.

Why every option is right or wrong

A. Offer reassurance without investigation: Persistent pulsatile tinnitus warrants investigation.

B. Perform only a pure-tone audiogram: Audiology is useful but does not define a vascular cause.

C. Start migraine prophylaxis first: This should not replace structural assessment.

D. Arrange targeted audiological and vascular/temporal-bone imaging through an ENT-led pathway: The manoeuvre suggests a venous contribution but does not establish a benign diagnosis. Imaging should be selected to assess the relevant venous and osseous anatomy.

E. Use carotid Doppler as the sole test: It may miss venous and temporal-bone causes.

What if the scenario changed?

If tinnitus were non-pulsatile, bilateral and associated with symmetrical hearing loss, extensive vascular imaging would be less likely to be first-line.