FRCS (ORL-HNS) · SECTION 1 SBA

Cochlear implantation after meningitis

A child who became profoundly deaf after pneumococcal meningitis is referred six weeks later. MRI suggests early cochlear fibrosis. What is the best planning principle?

CHOOSE ONE ANSWER

Best of five

  1. A. Wait until language delay is established
  2. B. Use hearing aids indefinitely without implant assessment
  3. C. Expedite multidisciplinary cochlear-implant assessment because progressive ossification can reduce electrode insertion options
  4. D. Avoid imaging because meningitis explains the loss
  5. E. Implant without infection-risk review
ANSWER AND REASONING

C. Expedite multidisciplinary cochlear-implant assessment because progressive ossification can reduce electrode insertion options

Post-meningitic fibrosis/ossification may progress. Candidacy, imaging, vaccination history and surgical timing require coordinated specialist assessment rather than routine delayed referral.

Why every option is right or wrong

A. Wait until language delay is established: Delay can reduce both auditory rehabilitation opportunity and surgical feasibility.

B. Use hearing aids indefinitely without implant assessment: Profound post-meningitic loss may not receive adequate acoustic benefit.

C. Expedite multidisciplinary cochlear-implant assessment because progressive ossification can reduce electrode insertion options: Post-meningitic fibrosis/ossification may progress. Candidacy, imaging, vaccination history and surgical timing require coordinated specialist assessment rather than routine delayed referral.

D. Avoid imaging because meningitis explains the loss: Imaging informs cochlear patency and operative planning.

E. Implant without infection-risk review: Vaccination and infection history remain relevant.

What if the scenario changed?

If imaging showed a fully patent cochlea and the child was clinically stable, urgency remains important but surgical access may be less constrained.