FRCS (ORL-HNS) · SECTION 1 SBA

Bilateral vocal-fold immobility after thyroid surgery

Immediately after total thyroidectomy, a patient develops biphasic stridor and flexible endoscopy shows both vocal folds near the midline. They are alert with normal oxygen saturation. What is the best next management principle?

CHOOSE ONE ANSWER

Best of five

  1. A. Discharge with voice therapy
  2. B. Assume unilateral recurrent-laryngeal-nerve palsy
  3. C. Perform permanent cordotomy immediately in recovery
  4. D. Wait for a six-week clinic review
  5. E. Urgent controlled airway planning with senior ENT and anaesthetic input
ANSWER AND REASONING

E. Urgent controlled airway planning with senior ENT and anaesthetic input

Bilateral near-midline vocal-fold immobility can deteriorate abruptly. Normal saturation does not remove airway risk; the team should establish a controlled strategy and assess reversible causes rather than observing unprepared.

Why every option is right or wrong

A. Discharge with voice therapy: This ignores a potentially critical airway.

B. Assume unilateral recurrent-laryngeal-nerve palsy: The endoscopic finding is bilateral and the physiology differs.

C. Perform permanent cordotomy immediately in recovery: Definitive airway-widening surgery depends on recovery potential, cause and a planned airway assessment.

D. Wait for a six-week clinic review: That delay is unsafe with acute stridor.

E. Urgent controlled airway planning with senior ENT and anaesthetic input: Bilateral near-midline vocal-fold immobility can deteriorate abruptly. Normal saturation does not remove airway risk; the team should establish a controlled strategy and assess reversible causes rather than observing unprepared.

What if the scenario changed?

If one cord moved normally and the airway was adequate, aspiration/voice rehabilitation and observation could be considered instead.

EDUCATIONAL USE

Draft Clinora educational material only; not official JCIE content, an accredited programme, or a substitute for local policy and specialist judgement.

Back to the Section 1 bank