ANSWER AND REASONINGB. It may improve obstruction, but residual OSA is common and monitored perioperative care and reassessment are needed
Children with trisomy 21 often have multilevel obstruction and comorbidity. The correct decision is not a reflex refusal of surgery, but risk-stratified counselling, postoperative monitoring and a plan for residual disease.
Why every option is right or wrong
A. It guarantees cure if tonsils are enlarged: This overlooks multilevel obstruction and residual risk.
B. It may improve obstruction, but residual OSA is common and monitored perioperative care and reassessment are needed: Children with trisomy 21 often have multilevel obstruction and comorbidity. The correct decision is not a reflex refusal of surgery, but risk-stratified counselling, postoperative monitoring and a plan for residual disease.
C. Polysomnography has no role once tonsils are large: Objective severity can inform risk stratification and follow-up.
D. CPAP is never appropriate in children: CPAP may be required for residual disease or when surgery is unsuitable.
E. Use a standard low-risk day-case pathway: Severe OSA and trisomy 21 may require enhanced monitoring.
What if the scenario changed?
If postoperative assessment showed persistent OSA, CPAP and targeted multilevel evaluation would need reconsideration.